Questionnaire: Establishments are Wishing to Carry out Circuit Board Prototyping On-site
Polling of printed circuit board (PCB) designers and makers, domestic electrical engineers, Original equipment manufacturers and others keen on 3D-printed PCB boards and circuits discloses that there’s growing requirement for in-house prototyping for exploration and product development. The enthusiasm is quite keen among firms that pay as much or more than $100,000 on a yearly basis for prototyping solutions.
Of the approximately 975 participants – that represent 31 industries and disciplines and 25 nations around the world – involved in the investigation conducted by Nano Dimension Ltd., 70 % shell out about $50,000 and 14 percent mentioned they spend more money than $50,000 annually on circuit board prototyping. In addition, a full 16 %, or 142 respondents, are forking over upwards of $100,000 to delegated prototyping vendors every year. The vast majority of respondents stated that the prototyping rates were big basically because they require the manufacturing of advanced, multi-layer circuit boards – with 66 percent of those questioned saying their designs demand multiple layers.
While over 9 in 10 participants explained their enterprises employ off-site prototyping industrial facilities presently, roughly two in three stated that they feel their intellectual property (IP) is at an increased risk when they go for it. Many claim they is hoping for alternatives for printing their own circuit boards in house.
“Designers and engineers certainly desire shorter turnaround times and lowered threat each time sending their design files for prototyping,” said Simon Fried, Nano Dimension’s Chief Business Officer and a enterprise co-founder. “But with the vast majority of the manufacturing houses based in Asia, timeliness isn’t an option. The reality is, at times they end up with PCB boards for production which are not optimized as much as they desire due to the long lead times. And mailing out designs continually raises the likelihood that the IP could be replicated or taken.”
Even if the prototyping houses are really reliable partners, the time constraints related to outsourcing can stifle innovation. Many designers rely on “safe” circuit card designs instead of exploring new ideas for fear they may trigger multiple versions – and extra delays – with the prototyping plant.
“With innovative alternate options similar to Dragonfly 2020 3D Printer of Nano Dimension, the electronics can eventually catch up to other types of manufacturing that have benefited from additive manufacturing,” Fried said. “Our survey exhibits the necessity is out there, and the market is ready for 3D-printed circuit cards which can be made on-site efficiently and cost-effectively.”
Nano Dimension, a leader in the field of 3D printed electronics, hosts the poll on its web site. Participants stand for industries covering everything from PCB makers and OEMs to engineering, defense, manufacturing, aerospace, electronics, medical-related, sensors and wearables, telecoms, energy and others.